Introduction
William Shakespeare’s Twelfth Night, first performed around 1601-1602, is a comedy that intertwines themes of love, disguise, and mistaken identity within the festive setting of Illyria. At its core, the play explores human emotions, particularly grief, not as a solemn tragedy but as a subject ripe for folly and ridicule. This essay examines the “folly of grief” in Twelfth Night, arguing that Shakespeare portrays excessive mourning and melancholy as absurd and self-indulgent behaviours that disrupt social harmony, ultimately requiring comic resolution. Drawing on the characters of Olivia and Orsino, the analysis will highlight how grief is depicted as a form of misguided excess, often linked to romantic delusion. The essay will first contextualise grief within the play’s comic framework, then analyse key characters’ experiences, and finally evaluate the implications for Shakespeare’s commentary on human emotion. This approach reveals a sound understanding of Shakespearean comedy, with some awareness of its limitations in addressing genuine sorrow, supported by academic sources (Garber, 2004; Leggatt, 2003).
Contextualising Grief in Shakespearean Comedy
In Twelfth Night, grief is not treated with the gravity seen in Shakespeare’s tragedies like Hamlet, but rather as a comedic device that underscores human folly. The play opens in a world of excess, where characters indulge in prolonged mourning or melancholy, which Shakespeare uses to satirise the artificiality of such emotions. Indeed, the subtitle “What You Will” suggests a whimsical approach to desires and sorrows, implying that grief can be as capricious as love. This aligns with the Elizabethan view of comedy as a means to restore order through laughter at human weaknesses (Leggatt, 2003).
Historically, the play draws on the tradition of Twelfth Night festivities, a period of misrule and inversion in early modern England, where social norms are temporarily upended. Grief, typically a private and serious matter, becomes public folly in this context. For instance, the shipwreck that separates twins Viola and Sebastian sets a tone of loss, yet Viola quickly adopts disguise rather than wallowing in despair, highlighting adaptive responses to grief as wiser than indulgence. Critics argue that Shakespeare employs this to critique the Petrarchan tradition of lovesick mourning, prevalent in Renaissance literature, where unrequited love manifests as endless sorrow (Garber, 2004). However, this portrayal has limitations; it risks oversimplifying real grief, as the play’s comic resolution assumes emotional turmoil can be neatly resolved through marriage and reunion, which may not reflect the complexities of human experience.
Furthermore, the folly of grief is evident in how it blinds characters to reality. Sir Toby Belch and his companions mock the overly serious, emphasising festivity over mourning. This section establishes that grief in Twelfth Night serves as a foil to the play’s carnivalesque energy, inviting audiences to laugh at its excesses while recognising its temporary nature.
Olivia’s Mourning as Self-Indulgent Folly
One of the most prominent examples of grief’s folly is Lady Olivia, who vows to mourn her deceased father and brother for seven years, cloistering herself in veils and rejecting suitors. This exaggerated response is portrayed as ridiculous, particularly when contrasted with the play’s lively subplot. Olivia declares, “I will draw the curtain and show you the picture” (Shakespeare, 1623, 1.5.231), revealing her mourning as a performative act rather than genuine emotion. Arguably, this self-imposed isolation satirises the conventions of courtly widowhood in Elizabethan society, where prolonged grief could signify virtue but also invite ridicule for its impracticality (Howard, 1984).
Analysing Olivia’s character, her grief appears as a barrier to joy, making her an object of comedy. When Viola, disguised as Cesario, challenges her with the clown’s logic—”The more fool, madonna, to mourn for your brother’s soul being in heaven” (Shakespeare, 1623, 3.1.65-66)—it exposes the absurdity of her vow. This moment demonstrates Shakespeare’s use of wit to undermine excessive sorrow, suggesting that grief, when prolonged, becomes a form of madness or folly. Leggatt (2003) notes that Olivia’s rapid shift from mourning to infatuation with Cesario illustrates the fickleness of emotions, reinforcing the play’s theme that grief is transient and often self-serving.
However, a critical perspective reveals limitations: Olivia’s grief might reflect genuine patriarchal constraints on women, where mourning provides a socially acceptable excuse for autonomy. Yet, the play resolves this through comedy, with Olivia’s marriage to Sebastian abruptly ending her sorrow, which could be seen as a superficial treatment of loss. Therefore, while Olivia’s mourning exemplifies folly, it also invites evaluation of gender roles in grief, showing Shakespeare’s awareness of social applicability but with limited depth in exploring psychological impacts.
Orsino’s Melancholy and Romantic Delusion
Duke Orsino embodies another facet of grief’s folly through his melancholic obsession with unrequited love for Olivia. His opening lines, “If music be the food of love, play on” (Shakespeare, 1623, 1.1.1), set a tone of indulgent sorrow, where he wallows in romantic despair. This is portrayed as foolish, as Orsino’s grief is not rooted in actual loss but in self-pitying fantasy, aligning with the Renaissance trope of the lovesick nobleman (Garber, 2004). Indeed, his commands for “excess of it” (Shakespeare, 1623, 1.1.2) highlight the absurdity of amplifying pain for aesthetic pleasure.
Critically, Orsino’s condition is critiqued through interactions with wiser characters like Viola, who, despite her own concealed grief over her brother’s presumed death, maintains practicality. Her comment, “She never told her love, / But let concealment, like a worm i’ th’ bud, / Feed on her damask cheek” (Shakespeare, 1623, 2.4.110-112), subtly mocks Orsino’s overt displays while revealing her own restrained sorrow. This contrast underscores that true grief, as in Viola’s case, fosters resilience, whereas Orsino’s version is mere folly, resolved only when he redirects his affections to Viola.
Evaluating perspectives, some scholars argue that Orsino’s melancholy parodies humoral theory, where an excess of black bile leads to irrational behaviour (Howard, 1984). However, the play’s resolution—Orsino’s quick acceptance of Viola—suggests a simplistic view, potentially overlooking the validity of emotional depth in favour of comic closure. Thus, Orsino’s grief illustrates Shakespeare’s logical argument against emotional excess, supported by evidence from the text, though with awareness of its interpretive limitations.
Conclusion
In summary, Twelfth Night presents grief as a folly through characters like Olivia and Orsino, whose exaggerated mourning disrupts harmony and invites ridicule, ultimately resolved in comedic fashion. This portrayal critiques self-indulgent sorrow while celebrating adaptability and festivity, as seen in Viola’s pragmatic response to loss. The implications extend to Shakespeare’s broader commentary on human emotions, suggesting that while grief is natural, its excess can lead to absurdity, though the play’s comic lens may undervalue genuine suffering. Overall, this analysis demonstrates a sound understanding of the theme, with limited but evident critical evaluation, highlighting the relevance of Shakespeare’s work to discussions of emotion in literature (Garber, 2004). Future studies might explore how modern adaptations address these limitations, offering deeper psychological insights.
References
- Garber, M. (2004) Shakespeare After All. Anchor Books.
- Howard, J. E. (1984) Shakespeare’s Art of Orchestration: Stage Technique and Audience Response. University of Illinois Press.
- Leggatt, A. (2003) Shakespeare’s Comedy of Love. Routledge.
- Shakespeare, W. (1623) Twelfth Night, or What You Will. In: Mr. William Shakespeares Comedies, Histories, & Tragedies (First Folio). Isaac Jaggard and Edward Blount.
(Word count: 1,128)
