The Guaranteed Grade
AI Essay Writer

Trained on over 100,000 essays and expertly programmed under the guidance of former university lecturers to deliver precise, academically robust results every time.

Free: Our basic AI essay writes to a 2:2/C Undergraduate standard.

No registration required, up to 1,000 words. Register here free to increase to 1500 words.

Your essay will be published on our site.

Paid: Want our 1st/A and 2:1/B standard AI writers? Register here.

From just £9.99/month. Plus generate longer essays of up to 3,000 words with grade guarantee.

Your essay is private & never published.

Choose your AI model:

What course are you taking?

Select word count:

+ Add notes for the AI?

Paste a writing sample? (optional, max 500 words)

As seen on:

The essay “was of a 2:1 standard and had no mistakes whatsoever”

~ BBC News, 17 Dec 2025

Why use our AI essay writer?

Register for advanced and premium AI essay writers.

Our Advanced and Premium AI essay writer models have been expertly trained on billions of expert essays, documents, journals and academic books. They generate longer essays (up to 3,000 words) written to a higher standard (Undergraduate 2:1/B or 1st class/A). Essays generated using this model are never published, and you can add a grade guarantee.

Our basic AI essays are always free

Give yourself a head start on your essay, coursework or assignment. Generate a free 2:2 standard AI essay up to 1,500 words instantly (published on our site).

Learn More

Easy to use

Unlike other complex software, our AI essay writer really is very simple to use.

Paste in your essay title

Add any extra info (optional): Tell the AI if you’d like it to focus on a particular area, jurisdiction etc.

Sit back and wait: Your essay will be ready for you in just a few moments.

Study aid: Use your essay as a powerful study aid to help you write your own work.

Writes essays effortlessly

Instant, accurate essays with top-level LLM performance.

Clear essay structure

No stress, just high-quality writing every time.

Deep, reliable research

Expert knowledge at your fingertips instantly.

Recently generated free AI essays:

These essays were generated by our free basic AI essay writer. Essays created with our advanced and premium essay writer models are never published – register to get started!

“The Room” (2003): Anatomija Rediteljske Katastrofe

Tommy Wiseau-ov film The Room iz 2003. godine jedna je od najfascinantnijih anomalija u istoriji kinematografije. Produciran s budžetom od šest miliona dolara, ovaj …

How does Malaysia’s Bumiputera Policy Attempt to Correct Historical Inequality While Also Reinforcing Ethnic Boundaries Between “Native” and “Non-Native” Citizens? In Chapter 8 of Ethnicity and Nationalism, Thomas Hylland Eriksen examines the relationship between identity politics, culture, and rights in multicultural societies. He argues that governments face a difficult challenge when addressing inequalities experienced by particular ethnic groups. If governments ignore ethnic differences and treat everyone identically, historical disadvantages may remain unaddressed. However, if governments recognize and support specific groups through public policy, those groups become formally defined and politically significant. As a result, policies intended to promote equality may also reinforce ethnic categories. Malaysia’s Bumiputera policy provides a useful example of this tension. Malaysia’s New Economic Policy (NEP) was introduced in 1971 following the ethnic riots of 1969. The policy emerged from a society in which economic activities had become strongly associated with ethnicity. During the colonial period, Malays were concentrated in rural agricultural sectors, Chinese communities were heavily represented in commerce and urban business, while many Indians worked on plantations and estates (Article 2). The government viewed these patterns as a source of inequality and ethnic tension. Consequently, the NEP sought not only to reduce poverty but also to restructure society by eliminating the identification of ethnicity with economic function (Article 2). To achieve this goal, preferential policies were introduced for Bumiputera populations, including Malays and other Indigenous groups, particularly in areas such as education and economic participation (Article 1). However, the policy created a contradiction that remains relevant today. The NEP sought to weaken the connection between ethnicity and economic position, yet it relied on ethnic classification to achieve that objective. The government wanted ethnicity to become less economically meaningful, but doing so required ethnicity to become more politically meaningful. This raises an important question: can governments reduce ethnic inequality without reinforcing the ethnic categories on which their policies depend? From Eriksen’s perspective, this question reflects a broader challenge of multicultural governance. Efforts to reduce inequality often require governments to identify which groups have been disadvantaged and design policies specifically for them. In Malaysia, this meant distinguishing between Bumiputera and non-Bumiputera populations. These categories were not merely cultural labels. They became administrative and political categories that influenced access to educational opportunities, business programs, and other forms of state support (Article 1). Ethnicity therefore became embedded within the distribution of resources and opportunities. The Malaysian case illustrates an important paradox. The NEP was designed to reduce the significance of ethnicity in economic life by increasing Bumiputera participation in sectors where they had historically been underrepresented. Yet the policy itself depended on maintaining ethnic distinctions. In practice, reducing ethnic inequality required the continued recognition of ethnic categories. Rather than disappearing, those categories remained central to public policy because they determined who qualified for assistance and who did not. At the same time, interpreting the policy solely as a mechanism of ethnic boundary reinforcement would be incomplete. The policy responded to genuine inequalities and appears to have contributed to the growth of a Bumiputera middle class and greater participation in higher education and professional occupations (Article 1). For supporters, these outcomes demonstrate that targeted intervention was necessary because equal treatment alone would not have altered historically unequal conditions. Critics, however, argue that the continued reliance on ethnicity risks institutionalizing divisions that the policy originally sought to overcome. They question whether assistance should increasingly be based on socioeconomic need rather than ethnic identity. Malaysia’s Bumiputera policy highlights the dilemma identified by Eriksen. The policy attempted to make ethnicity less economically meaningful while simultaneously making ethnicity more politically meaningful. Its achievements in addressing historical inequalities cannot be separated from its reliance on ethnic categorization. The Malaysian case therefore suggests that in multicultural societies, efforts to promote equality and efforts to reduce the significance of ethnic boundaries may not always move in the same direction.

I’m unable to provide the requested essay, as I cannot accurately verify or cite the specific sources, references, or detailed facts needed without fabricating …

Importance of arts education in school

The purpose of this essay is to examine the role of arts education within the secondary school curriculum in the United Kingdom. It considers …

The Guaranteed Grade AI Essay Writer