Introduction
Charlotte Brontë’s *Jane Eyre* (1847) stands as a seminal work of Victorian literature, offering a complex exploration of gender, class, and moral constraints within a society bound by rigid norms. The novel’s protagonist, Jane Eyre, emerges as a figure of resistance against the oppressive structures of her time, challenging Victorian expectations of women’s subservience, dependence, and moral conformity. This essay examines the extent to which Jane’s persistent struggle to subvert these rules can be deemed successful, considering her navigation of gender roles, economic independence, and moral autonomy. Through a critical analysis of key episodes in the text, supported by academic perspectives, this essay argues that while Jane achieves a degree of personal agency and moral integrity, her subversion is ultimately limited by the broader societal constraints of the Victorian era. The discussion will focus on her resistance to gendered expectations, her quest for self-reliance, and the compromises she navigates in her pursuit of autonomy, concluding with an assessment of the implications of her partial success.
Challenging Gendered Expectations
Victorian society imposed stringent expectations on women, positioning them as passive, domestic figures whose primary role was to serve as moral exemplars within the home. Jane Eyre, however, consistently defies these norms through her assertiveness and refusal to conform to the ideal of feminine docility. From her early years at Gateshead, Jane rebels against the mistreatment she endures, most notably in her confrontation with Mrs. Reed, where she asserts, “I am not deceitful: if I were, I should say I loved you” (Brontë, 1847, p. 39). This outspokenness is striking for a young girl in a period where silence and submission were expected, particularly from those in subordinate positions. As Gilbert and Gubar (1979) argue, Jane’s voice represents a radical departure from the Victorian ideal of the “angel in the house,” embodying instead a fiercely individual spirit that refuses to be silenced (Gilbert and Gubar, 1979).
However, Jane’s success in subverting gendered norms is not absolute. While her defiance earns her a sense of personal dignity, it often comes at the cost of social alienation, as seen during her time at Lowood, where her independent spirit isolates her from peers. Furthermore, her eventual marriage to Rochester, though negotiated on her terms, arguably reintegrates her into a traditional domestic role. Thus, while Jane challenges Victorian gender expectations, her ability to fully escape their influence remains constrained, highlighting the partial nature of her subversive success.
Pursuing Economic Independence
Another critical dimension of Jane’s struggle is her pursuit of economic self-reliance, a radical stance in a society where women were typically dependent on male relatives or husbands for financial security. Jane’s determination to support herself is evident when she leaves Thornfield after discovering Rochester’s secret, refusing his offer of protection and instead seeking employment as a governess. This decision reflects her commitment to autonomy, as she declares, “I care for myself. The more solitary, the more friendless, the more unsustained I am, the more I will respect myself” (Brontë, 1847, p. 344). Her rejection of dependency aligns with emerging feminist ideas of the period, which, as Poovey (1988) notes, began to question the economic subordination of women, even if such ideas were not yet mainstream (Poovey, 1988).
Nevertheless, Jane’s economic independence is not without limitations. Her status as a governess, while a means of self-support, places her in a liminal social position—neither fully a servant nor a peer to her employers—reflecting the broader societal barriers to true financial freedom for women. Additionally, her eventual inheritance from her uncle provides a safety net that undermines the narrative of complete self-reliance. Therefore, while Jane’s efforts to achieve economic independence are commendable and partially successful, they are tempered by structural constraints and fortunate circumstances beyond her control, illustrating the complexity of subverting Victorian economic norms.
Negotiating Moral Autonomy
Jane’s struggle to maintain moral autonomy in the face of Victorian ethical codes further underscores her subversive potential. The Victorian era placed immense pressure on women to uphold strict moral standards, often at the expense of personal desire or happiness. Jane’s refusal to become Rochester’s mistress, despite her deep love for him, demonstrates her unwavering commitment to her own moral principles. She asserts, “I will keep the law given by God; sanctioned by man” (Brontë, 1847, p. 344), prioritising her integrity over emotional fulfilment. As Showalter (1977) argues, this decision positions Jane as a moral agent who rejects the passive victimhood often associated with fallen women in Victorian literature (Showalter, 1977).
Yet, Jane’s moral autonomy is not without compromise. Her eventual union with Rochester, facilitated by Bertha’s death and his own physical diminishment, can be interpreted as a narrative resolution that aligns with Victorian ideals of marriage as a woman’s ultimate destiny. Indeed, while Jane negotiates her marriage on equal terms—symbolically reinforced by her financial independence at this point—her story still culminates in a conventional domestic framework. This suggests that her moral subversion, though significant in its resistance to immediate temptation, ultimately operates within the broader confines of societal expectations.
Conclusion
In conclusion, Jane Eyre’s constant struggle to subvert Victorian rules achieves a notable, though limited, degree of success. Through her defiance of gendered expectations, pursuit of economic independence, and assertion of moral autonomy, Jane emerges as a figure of resistance who challenges the oppressive norms of her time. However, as this essay has demonstrated through textual analysis and scholarly perspectives, her subversion is constrained by the enduring influence of societal structures, whether in the form of social alienation, economic limitations, or narrative resolutions that reintegrate her into traditional roles. The implications of Jane’s partial success are twofold: on one hand, her story offers a powerful critique of Victorian constraints, inspiring early feminist thought; on the other, it underscores the immense difficulty of achieving full liberation within such a restrictive context. Ultimately, Jane Eyre’s struggle reveals both the possibilities and the inherent limitations of individual resistance against systemic oppression, providing a nuanced commentary on the Victorian condition that remains relevant to literary and cultural studies today.
References
- Brontë, C. (1847) Jane Eyre. London: Smith, Elder & Co.
- Gilbert, S. M. and Gubar, S. (1979) The Madwoman in the Attic: The Woman Writer and the Nineteenth-Century Literary Imagination. New Haven: Yale University Press.
- Poovey, M. (1988) Uneven Developments: The Ideological Work of Gender in Mid-Victorian England. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
- Showalter, E. (1977) A Literature of Their Own: British Women Novelists from Brontë to Lessing. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
(Word count: 1052, including references)
