Introduction
It is often argued that social services policy plays a pivotal role in addressing societal issues such as poverty, mental health, and family welfare, particularly within the context of social work practice. This essay critically examines social services policy in relation to the Phillips family case study, where challenges including financial hardship, mental health difficulties, and community resource closures are evident. By anchoring the analysis in this case, broader implications for social problems like child neglect, unemployment, and housing insecurity will be explored, alongside the legal foundations of relevant policies. Furthermore, the role of social work, encompassing values, ethics, and anti-discriminatory practice, will be discussed, with attention to tensions arising from politically driven agendas, staff shortages, and external factors such as COVID-19. Drawing primarily on Mullen (2025), alongside other scholarly sources, it will be demonstrated how these elements intersect, highlighting implications for social work practice in a general sense. The discussion aims to reveal both the supportive and limiting aspects of policy, emphasising anti-oppressive approaches while considering service user perspectives.
Social Services Policy and Its Legal Basis in the Context of the Case Study
It cannot be denied that social services policy in the UK is underpinned by key legislation designed to safeguard vulnerable families, such as the Children Act 1989 and the Care Act 2014, which provide the legal basis for interventions in cases involving child welfare and adult support needs. In the Phillips family scenario, where children Mary and Grace report neglect linked to parental mental health and financial strain, Children’s Services involvement is legally mandated under the Children Act 1989, which requires local authorities to investigate concerns about significant harm (Cunningham and Cunningham, 2017). This act emphasises the paramountcy of the child’s welfare, compelling social workers to assess risks without delving into operational specifics for this family.
Moreover, adult social policy, as outlined in the Care Act 2014, addresses Rachel’s chronic pain and depression by promoting well-being and independence, though access to benefits like Personal Independence Payment (PIP) is often fraught with appeals, as seen in her rejected claims. It should be noted that these policies are influenced by broader welfare reforms, including the Welfare Reform Act 2012, which introduced sanctions on benefits—evident in Noel’s experience of income reporting failures leading to penalties. Such legal frameworks, while intended to support, can exacerbate social problems through bureaucratic hurdles, as argued by Mullen (2025), who highlights how policy implementation often fails to account for intersecting vulnerabilities like race and class in mixed-ethnicity families like the Phillips’.
Widening the focus, these policies impact general social issues such as poverty and mental health, where austerity-driven cuts, as in Noel’s redundancy, reflect neoliberal ideologies prioritising market efficiency over social support (Garrett, 2018). Indeed, the closure of the community centre illustrates funding shortages under local government austerity measures, legally permitted but critically viewed as discriminatory against low-income communities (Sealey, 2015).
How Social Services Policy Addresses and Impacts Social Problems
It is the case that social services policy addresses social problems like poverty and mental health in the case study through mechanisms such as welfare benefits and child protection referrals, yet it often impacts them negatively by reinforcing inequalities. For instance, Noel’s zero-hours contract and benefit sanctions exemplify how Universal Credit policies, introduced under the Welfare Reform and Work Act 2016, aim to incentivise work but can deepen debt and housing insecurity, as the family faces potential eviction from private rental accommodation. This is critically examined by Mullen (2025), who argues that such policies, while legally grounded, fail to mitigate the structural causes of poverty, instead individualising blame and stigmatising claimants—evident in Noel’s reluctance to engage with the job centre due to fears of being labelled a “benefits scrounger.”
Furthermore, Rachel’s depression and back pain highlight how adult social policy, including mental health support under the Mental Health Act 1983 (amended 2007), intersects with disability benefits, yet delays in appeals processes can prolong suffering. It will be recognised that these policies address problems superficially but impact them adversely by overlooking anti-oppressive practice; for example, Rachel’s Black British heritage may compound discriminatory experiences in benefits assessments, as systemic biases in welfare systems are noted in literature (Beresford and Carr, 2018). Generally, such policies contribute to wider social issues like child hunger and family breakdown, exacerbated by community resource closures, which Mullen (2025) links to funding cuts that disproportionately affect marginalised groups.
The COVID-19 pandemic further amplified these impacts, with staff shortages in social services leading to delayed responses, as resources were stretched thin (Cunningham et al., 2026). This demonstrates how policy, while adaptive in theory, often falls short in practice, perpetuating cycles of disadvantage.
Implications for Social Work and Social Work Practice
It should be pointed out that the implications for social work practice in addressing these problems involve navigating values and ethics, such as those outlined in the British Association of Social Workers’ (BASW) code, which emphasises empowerment and anti-discriminatory practice. In the Phillips case, social workers must balance child protection duties with supporting parental mental health, fostering anti-oppressive approaches that challenge racial and economic discrimination (Mullen, 2025). However, shortages in social work staffing, intensified by COVID-19, limit capacity for holistic interventions, leading to crisis-driven rather than preventive practice (Evans and Keating, 2016).
Broadly, the role of the social worker is linked to ideologies; neoliberal agendas promote individual responsibility, clashing with social work’s emancipatory ethos, as Garrett (2018) critiques. This creates implications where practitioners may inadvertently reinforce oppression, such as through culturally insensitive assessments in diverse families. Ethics demand consideration of service user perspectives, ensuring voices like Rachel’s are heard to avoid pathologising depression as personal failure rather than a policy-induced issue (Dorling, 2015). Anti-discriminatory practice thus requires challenging discriminatory policies, though practical constraints like high caseloads hinder this.
Tensions Between Social Work, Social Policy, and Politically Driven Agendas
It is believed that significant tensions exist between social work, social policy, and contemporary political agendas, particularly austerity and neoliberalism, which prioritise cost-cutting over welfare. In the case study, policies like benefit sanctions reflect politically driven welfare reforms that undermine social work’s commitment to social justice, creating ethical dilemmas for practitioners (Mullen, 2025). For example, the ideological shift towards conditionality in benefits, as in Noel’s sanctions, tensions with anti-oppressive practice by vulnerabilising families, a point echoed in Hodkinson et al. (2020), who discuss how hostile environments fuel exploitation.
Moreover, COVID-19 exposed these tensions through increased demands on understaffed services, where political decisions on funding failed to align with social work needs (Cunningham et al., 2026). Service user perspectives, such as the Phillips children’s sense of loss from the community centre closure, highlight how politically motivated cuts disregard participatory welfare, as advocated by Beresford and Carr (2018). Ethics and values are strained, with social workers navigating anti-discriminatory imperatives amid policies that may entrench racial inequalities.
Conclusion
In summary, social services policy, grounded in legislation like the Children Act 1989 and Care Act 2014, addresses but often exacerbates social problems in the Phillips case, such as poverty and mental health, through mechanisms like benefits and child protection. Implications for social work practice underscore the need for anti-oppressive, ethically driven approaches, yet tensions with politically driven agendas, staff shortages, and COVID-19 impacts reveal systemic limitations. It is evident that while policies provide a framework, their application must prioritise service user perspectives to foster genuine change, urging a reevaluation of neoliberal ideologies in favour of inclusive, anti-discriminatory strategies. Ultimately, these insights highlight the broader challenges in aligning social policy with emancipatory social work practice.
References
- Beresford, P. and Carr, S. (2018) Social policy first hand: an international introduction to participatory social welfare. Bristol: Policy Press.
- Cunningham, J. and Cunningham, S. (2017) Social policy and social work: an introduction. 2nd ed. London: Sage.
- Cunningham, J., Cunningham, S. and O’Sullivan, A. (2026) Social policy and social work: an introduction (Transforming Social Work Practice Series). 3rd ed. London: Learning Matters.
- Dorling, D. (2015) Injustice: why social inequality persists. Fully revised and updated edition. Bristol: The Policy Press.
- Evans, A. and Keating, F. (2016) Policy & social work practice. Los Angeles: SAGE.
- Garrett, P.M. (2018) Social work and social theory: making connections. Bristol: The Policy Press.
- Hodkinson, S.N., Lewis, H., Waite, L. and Dwyer, P. (2020) Fighting or fuelling forced labour? The Modern Slavery Act 2015, irregular migrants and the vulnerabilising role of the UK’s hostile environment. Critical Social Policy, 41(1), pp. 68-90.
- Mullen, L. (2025) Applying social policy in social work practice. 1st ed. Abingdon: Taylor and Francis Ltd.
- Sealey, C. (2015) Social policy simplified: connecting theory and concepts with people’s lives. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
(Word count: 1,248)
