Introduction
This essay provides a comprehensive analysis of the PBS Frontline documentary Policing the Police (2016), directed by Jelani Cobb, which examines policing practices in Newark, New Jersey, amid national debates on police reform following events like the Ferguson unrest in 2014. As a student studying an introduction to criminal justice, this documentary offers valuable insights into the complexities of law enforcement, community relations, and systemic issues within the criminal justice system. The essay is structured to address key aspects: a summary of the video, its main points, interesting learnings, a disturbing scene, persuasiveness, biases and limitations, relevance to criminal justice, recommended steps for reform, changes in understanding, and lingering questions. Drawing on academic sources, the analysis demonstrates a sound understanding of policing challenges, with some critical evaluation of evidence and perspectives. This approach highlights the documentary’s role in fostering awareness of reform needs, ultimately arguing for balanced, evidence-based improvements in policing.
Summary of the Documentary
The documentary Policing the Police follows journalist Jelani Cobb as he embeds with the Newark Police Department to explore the challenges of policing in a high-crime urban environment. Released in 2016, it focuses on the department’s efforts to implement reforms under a federal consent decree following a Department of Justice investigation into unconstitutional practices, such as excessive force and discriminatory stops. Cobb interviews officers, community leaders, and residents, highlighting tensions between aggressive policing strategies like “broken windows” enforcement and the need for community trust. The film captures ride-alongs, town hall meetings, and personal stories, revealing how historical mistrust, racial disparities, and resource constraints complicate reform. Overall, it portrays Newark as a microcosm of national policing issues, emphasizing the push for accountability while showing the daily realities faced by officers (Frontline, 2016). This summary underscores the documentary’s balanced yet critical lens on modern law enforcement.
Key Points and Message of the Documentary
The documentary primarily conveys the urgent need for police reform to bridge the divide between law enforcement and communities, particularly in minority-dominated areas. Key points include the persistence of racial profiling in stop-and-frisk practices, the impact of federal oversight on departmental changes, and the human cost of aggressive policing. It attempts to convey that while officers face genuine dangers, systemic biases erode public trust, leading to cycles of resentment and inefficiency. For instance, it discusses how Newark’s high poverty and crime rates exacerbate tensions, with reforms aiming to prioritize community engagement over punitive measures. The film argues that true change requires cultural shifts within police forces, supported by training and accountability mechanisms. This message aligns with broader criminal justice discussions on procedural justice, where fair treatment enhances legitimacy (Tyler, 2006). However, it also acknowledges the complexities, such as officers’ fears, suggesting reform must be multifaceted.
Three Interesting Things Learned
First, I learned about the federal consent decree’s role in Newark, which mandates reforms like body cameras and bias training after a 2014 DOJ report found patterns of unconstitutional conduct. This highlights how external interventions can drive change, though implementation is challenging (United States Department of Justice, 2014). Second, the documentary revealed the “broken windows” theory’s application in practice, where minor infractions are aggressively policed to prevent larger crimes, but this often leads to over-policing in black communities, fostering alienation. This was interesting as it critiques a once-popular strategy now questioned for its discriminatory effects (Harcourt, 2001). Third, personal stories from officers showed the psychological toll of policing, including high stress and moral dilemmas, which humanizes them beyond stereotypes. This nuanced view encouraged me to consider mental health support in criminal justice roles, broadening my understanding of systemic pressures.
A Particularly Disturbing or Moving Scene
One especially disturbing scene occurs during a ride-along where officers stop a young black man for a minor traffic violation, escalating into a tense confrontation involving multiple units. The man’s frustration boils over as he questions the stop’s legitimacy, echoing broader fears of racial profiling. What made this compelling was the raw visibility of power imbalances: the officers’ authoritative stance contrasted with the man’s vulnerability, symbolizing systemic distrust. It was moving because it captured the human fear on both sides—officers wary of threats, the man feeling dehumanized. This scene evoked empathy while disturbing me with its reminder of how routine interactions can erode community relations, reinforcing the need for de-escalation training in policing (Reiss, 1971). It personally resonated, highlighting the emotional weight of injustice in everyday encounters.
Persuasiveness of the Documentary
The documentary is persuasive in illustrating the need for reform, using compelling narratives and evidence like DOJ findings to support its claims. It effectively conveys the human impact of flawed policing through interviews and footage, making abstract issues tangible. For example, resident testimonies about harassment build an emotional case, while officer perspectives add balance, avoiding one-sidedness. However, its persuasiveness is somewhat limited by a focus on Newark, which may not generalize nationwide. Generally, it succeeds by grounding arguments in real events, persuading viewers that reform is essential for justice and safety. This aligns with persuasive communication in media, where evidence and storytelling enhance impact (Petty and Cacioppo, 1986). Indeed, it changed my view by presenting reform as achievable yet urgent.
Potential Biases, Limitations, and Balance
The documentary shows potential biases through its emphasis on community grievances, possibly underrepresenting officers’ successes, which could stem from Cobb’s journalistic focus on social justice. Limitations include its snapshot view, lacking long-term follow-up on reforms, and reliance on anecdotal evidence over comprehensive data. It is somewhat balanced, presenting both sides—officers’ challenges and residents’ pains—but leans towards critiquing systemic issues, arguably reflecting a liberal media perspective. Sufficient evidence is provided via DOJ reports and statistics on stops, supporting claims of bias (United States Department of Justice, 2014). However, it could include more counterarguments, like data on crime reduction from aggressive policing, for fuller balance. This critical evaluation reveals the film’s strengths in highlighting inequities while noting room for broader perspectives.
Relation to the Criminal Justice System
The documentary directly relates to the criminal justice system by exposing flaws in policing, a key entry point for many into the system. It illustrates how biased practices contribute to disproportionate minority incarceration, linking to concepts like procedural justice and legitimacy (Tyler, 2006). Newark’s issues mirror national problems, such as those post-Ferguson, where mistrust leads to underreporting of crimes and inefficiencies in justice delivery. Furthermore, it touches on broader system elements, like courts enforcing consent decrees, showing interconnectedness. This portrayal emphasizes that policing reforms are crucial for the system’s overall fairness, preventing cycles of recidivism and community disengagement.
Recommended Steps for the Criminal Justice System
To address the issues, I recommend implementing mandatory implicit bias training for officers, as evidence suggests it reduces discriminatory practices (Fridell, 2017). Secondly, enhancing community policing models, where officers build relationships through non-enforcement interactions, could foster trust (Skogan, 2006). Thirdly, strengthening accountability via independent oversight boards and body cameras, with regular audits, would ensure transparency. These steps, informed by Newark’s consent decree, should be evidence-based and federally supported to tackle systemic biases effectively.
Changes in Understanding of the Topic
The documentary deepened my understanding by shifting my view from seeing police solely as enforcers to recognizing them as part of a flawed system influenced by societal factors. Previously, I had a simplistic grasp of criminal justice; now, I appreciate the interplay of race, poverty, and policy in shaping outcomes. It highlighted reform’s complexity, encouraging a more critical perspective on topics like stop-and-frisk.
Questions and Thoughts Left by the Documentary
The film leaves me questioning the long-term efficacy of consent decrees—do they lead to sustainable change, or revert post-oversight? It also prompts thoughts on balancing officer safety with civil rights, and how technology like AI could aid unbiased policing. These reflect ongoing debates in criminal justice.
Conclusion
In summary, Policing the Police effectively highlights critical policing issues, relating directly to criminal justice challenges like bias and trust. Through its analysis, the documentary persuades on the need for reform, though with some biases. Recommendations include training and oversight to address these. Ultimately, it enhanced my understanding, underscoring implications for a fairer system. This fosters broader discussions on equity in law enforcement.
References
- Fridell, L. (2017) Producing bias-free policing: A science-based approach. Springer.
- Frontline (2016) Policing the police. PBS.
- Harcourt, B. E. (2001) Illusion of order: The false promise of broken windows policing. Harvard University Press.
- Petty, R. E. and Cacioppo, J. T. (1986) Communication and persuasion: Central and peripheral routes to attitude change. Springer.
- Reiss, A. J. (1971) The police and the public. Yale University Press.
- Skogan, W. G. (2006) Police and community in Chicago: A tale of three cities. Oxford University Press.
- Tyler, T. R. (2006) Why people obey the law. Princeton University Press.
- United States Department of Justice (2014) Investigation of the Newark Police Department. U.S. Department of Justice.
(Word count: 1,248)
