Identifying the Murderer in Agatha Christie’s *And Then There Were None*

English essays

This essay was generated by our Basic AI essay writer model. For guaranteed 2:1 and 1st class essays, register and top up your wallet!

Introduction

Agatha Christie’s *And Then There Were None* (1939) is a seminal work of crime fiction, renowned for its intricate plot and psychological depth. This essay focuses on the events following Section V of Chapter 9 (page 141 in many editions), where the poem reveals that General Macarthur was “chopped in halves” metaphorically through his murder. With six remaining characters—Vera Claythorne, Philip Lombard, Dr. Armstrong, William Blore, Emily Brent, and Mr. Justice Wargrave—the task is to deduce the likely murderer among them. This analysis proposes that Mr. Justice Wargrave is the most probable culprit, supported by specific textual evidence. Additionally, a counterclaim will be addressed and refuted to strengthen the argument. By examining character motives and behaviours, this essay aims to provide a reasoned perspective on the killer’s identity, mindful of the novel’s suspenseful ambiguity.

Evidence Supporting Mr. Justice Wargrave as the Murderer

One compelling reason to suspect Mr. Justice Wargrave is his background as a retired judge, which equips him with a profound understanding of justice, law, and arguably, the psychology of guilt. Wargrave’s judicial career, as revealed early in the novel, involved presiding over criminal trials, giving him insight into orchestrating elaborate schemes without detection (Christie, 1939). This expertise could enable him to plan the murders methodically, aligning with the nursery rhyme’s structure as a perverse form of justice. Indeed, his obsession with punishing the guilty—evident in his private reflections on past cases—suggests a motive to act as both judge and executioner on the island.

Furthermore, Wargrave’s calm demeanour throughout the escalating chaos stands out as suspicious. While other characters exhibit visible fear or agitation, Wargrave remains composed, often taking a leadership role in discussions (Christie, 1939). This unflappability could indicate that he is not merely a passive victim but someone in control of the situation. Typically, genuine fear manifests in erratic behaviour, as seen in Vera’s paranoia or Blore’s defensiveness, making Wargrave’s serenity a potential clue to his complicity. Therefore, these traits—his legal acumen and unusual calm—point to Wargrave as the orchestrator of the murders.

Counterclaim and Refutation

However, a counterclaim might suggest that Philip Lombard, with his admitted history of violence and mercenary attitude, is a more likely suspect. Lombard openly confesses to leaving men to die for personal gain, displaying a clear lack of moral restraint (Christie, 1939). Some might argue that his physical capability and ruthless nature make him the obvious choice for a killer. Yet, this perspective overlooks a critical aspect: Lombard’s actions are driven by survival instinct rather than calculated malice. His transparency about past misdeeds contrasts with the secretive, meticulous planning required for the island murders. Wargrave, conversely, possesses the intellectual capacity and hidden motive to execute such a complex scheme. Thus, while Lombard’s violent past is notable, it lacks the sophistication demonstrated by the killings, reinforcing Wargrave as the more plausible culprit.

Conclusion

In conclusion, Mr. Justice Wargrave emerges as the most likely murderer among the remaining six characters in *And Then There Were None*. His judicial background provides the strategic prowess to orchestrate the killings, while his composed behaviour amidst chaos suggests control rather than fear. Although a counterclaim highlighting Philip Lombard’s violent tendencies presents a valid alternative, it fails to account for the calculated nature of the murders, which aligns more closely with Wargrave’s profile. This analysis, while speculative due to the novel’s deliberate ambiguity, underscores the complexity of Christie’s characters and invites further exploration into themes of justice and guilt. Ultimately, Wargrave’s portrayal as a cold, calculating figure offers a compelling case for his guilt, reflecting Christie’s mastery in crafting psychological intrigue within detective fiction.

References

  • Christie, A. (1939) *And Then There Were None*. Collins Crime Club.

Rate this essay:

How useful was this essay?

Click on a star to rate it!

Average rating 0 / 5. Vote count: 0

No votes so far! Be the first to rate this essay.

We are sorry that this essay was not useful for you!

Let us improve this essay!

Tell us how we can improve this essay?

Uniwriter
Uniwriter is a free AI-powered essay writing assistant dedicated to making academic writing easier and faster for students everywhere. Whether you're facing writer's block, struggling to structure your ideas, or simply need inspiration, Uniwriter delivers clear, plagiarism-free essays in seconds. Get smarter, quicker, and stress less with your trusted AI study buddy.

More recent essays:

English essays

The Existence of Independent Truth and Freedom in George Orwell’s 1984: When Political Power Controls Documents, Memories, and Language

Introduction George Orwell’s dystopian novel 1984, published in 1949, presents a chilling vision of a totalitarian regime where the Party, led by the enigmatic ...
English essays

Strength of Character in Never Let Me Go

Introduction True strength of character is not always evident in dramatic acts of rebellion or displays of physical power; rather, it can manifest in ...
English essays

However, these are different writers from different peoples—and they were writing at slightly different times. For this essay, I would like you to compare and contrast how these writers work within the existing set of assumptions regarding Indian peoplehood. Where do their texts resemble each other in advocating for Native peoples, and where do they differ? Recall Winnemucca’s insight into how exploitation of Native peoples on reservations was reinforced by the notion that Natives lacked any social structure and needed a benevolent agent to “civilize” them—as she reveals, the agents were the uncivilized ones. In a similar manner, note that appeals to certain stereotypes in Zitkala-Ša’s writing actually reverse the notions of civility and barbarism to reveal the systemic violence enacted through the boarding school system and allotment policy. Where do you see Winnemucca and Zitkala-Ša offer similar representations of violence or similar criticisms of federal Indian policy? Where do they differ? You might also consider how these texts challenge the predominant mythos of the American west, namely the civilized/savage binary that is a staple of popular culture even today (think about the caricatures of this period offered in many western movies of the last sixty years). Be mindful to paraphrase specific passages as you develop your response.

Introduction This essay compares and contrasts the works of Sarah Winnemucca Hopkins and Zitkala-Ša, two prominent Native American women writers from the late 19th ...