On September 4, 1981, the Manager of Gibson Discount Centre Charles Forswith Found That Money Was Missing: What Did Shon Hodges Have to Prove in a Civil Lawsuit for Malicious Prosecution?
Introduction This essay examines the legal principles surrounding a civil lawsuit for malicious prosecution in the context of a specific case involving Shon Hodges, ...
The Rules of Certainty of Intention and Certainty of Subject Matter Are Basically Straightforward. However, the Certainty of Objects Is Much More Complex and Has Sparked Debate Among Legal Scholars
Introduction In the realm of trust law, the creation of a valid express trust hinges on the satisfaction of the ‘three certainties’: certainty of ...
The Doctrine of Ratification in Agency Law: Reconciling Kelner v Baxter and Newborne v Sensolid
Introduction This essay critically examines the doctrine of ratification in agency law, as articulated by Peter Watts and F.M.B. Reynolds in *Bowstead and Reynolds ...
Role of International Humanitarian Law During Armed Conflicts Between State and Non-State Actors
Introduction International Humanitarian Law (IHL), often referred to as the law of armed conflict, serves as a critical framework to regulate the conduct of ...
Use Decided Cases, IRAC Formula, and Jamaican and Common Law to Advise on the Validity of the Marriage between P.J. and Lurline and Potential Divorce Options
Introduction This essay examines the legal issues surrounding the validity of the marriage between P.J. Brown and Lurline Smith, as well as the potential ...
Discuss the Validity of Rules of Certainty: Intention, Subject Matter, and Objects in the Law of Trusts
Introduction The law of trusts, a cornerstone of English equity, relies on the foundational principle of the ‘three certainties’ to establish a valid private ...
Memo on International Legal Implications of the FLY SIERRA LINE Incident
Introduction This memo addresses the tragic incident involving flight FLY SIERRA LINE, a commercial airline struck by a missile from the Nigerian Military on ...
Differences Between Country, Government, State, and Nation: A Legal Perspective
Introduction The concepts of country, government, state, and nation are often used interchangeably in everyday discourse, yet they hold distinct meanings, particularly within a ...
Critically Assess the Gradual Expansion of Human Rights Through Interpretation by Relevant Human Rights Bodies, Illustrated Through the Example of the Right to Life
Introduction Human rights, as enshrined in international instruments such as the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), are often subject to interpretation by judicial ...
There can never be any blame attached to anyone where a crime has been committed against them. Therefore, the actions of a victim can never amount to a novus actus interveniens. Discuss
Introduction This essay examines the assertion that no blame can be attached to a victim of a crime, and consequently, their actions cannot constitute ...
