Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Company: A Landmark in Contract Law
Introduction The case of Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Company (1893) stands as a cornerstone in English contract law, providing critical insights into the ...
Advising the Parties on the Legal Issues Surrounding Blackacre
Introduction This essay addresses the complex legal issues arising from the ownership, mortgages, and third-party rights related to the property Blackacre, purchased by Bruno ...
Words Matter in Commerce: The Significance of Arbitration Rules in Dispute Resolution
Introduction This essay explores the critical role of precise language in commercial contracts, particularly in the context of dispute resolution clauses. The focus is ...
Standard of Proving Fraud in International Trade
Introduction International trade, a cornerstone of global economic activity, is often marred by fraudulent practices that undermine trust, inflate costs, and disrupt fair competition. ...
Pitts v Hunt: A Critical Analysis of Vicarious Liability and Contributory Negligence in UK Tort Law
Introduction This essay examines the landmark case of Pitts v Hunt [1991] 1 QB 24, a significant decision in UK tort law that addresses ...
Dunlop v Selfridge: A Landmark Case in Contract Law
Introduction The case of *Dunlop Pneumatic Tyre Co Ltd v Selfridge & Co Ltd* [1915] AC 847 is a seminal decision in English contract ...
Whether One Can Take a Derivative Action Under the Companies Act
Introduction This essay examines the concept of derivative actions under the UK Companies Act 2006, focusing on whether and under what circumstances an individual ...
“Law should encourage citizens in their civic duty to do ‘the right thing’ in a moral sense and not to turn a blind eye or fail to act to help someone who is in need.” Consider to what extent the criminal law relating to omissions reflects this view.
Introduction The concept of legal responsibility often intersects with moral obligations, raising questions about whether the law should compel individuals to act ethically by ...
The Jury is an Outmoded Institution Which Survives Only Because of Sentimental Attachments. It Has No Real Role to Play and Should Be Abolished. Discuss with Case Examples.
Introduction The institution of the jury has long been a cornerstone of the English legal system, celebrated as a democratic mechanism that ensures fairness ...
Discuss 2 Reasons Why Breach of Duty in Negligence Is Unfair
Introduction This essay explores the concept of breach of duty in the context of negligence under English tort law, focusing on why such breaches ...
