
THE LEGAL THEORY OF VICARIOUS LIABILITY IN LAW OF TORTS
Introduction Vicarious liability is a pivotal doctrine in the law of torts, encapsulating the principle whereby one person can be held liable for the ...

Summarising the Cases of Re Polemis and Wagon Mound (No 1) in the Context of Ugandan Tort Law
Introduction This essay aims to summarise two landmark cases in tort law, Re Polemis (1921) and Overseas Tankship (UK) Ltd v Morts Dock and ...

Solidarity Rights
Introduction This essay explores the concept of solidarity rights within the context of civic studies, focusing on their definition, significance, and application in contemporary ...

Explaining Civil Offences, Insider Dealing, and Financial Crimes under UK Legislation
Introduction This essay explores the legal frameworks surrounding civil offences and financial crimes in the UK, with a specific focus on insider dealing and ...

Advising Frederico, Brenda, and Claire on Tort Law Claims Against Fisher & Sons and Dr Chenowith
Introduction This essay examines the potential tort law claims of Frederico, Brenda, and Claire against Fisher & Sons and, in Brenda’s case, Dr Chenowith. ...

2 Major Differences Between Written and Unwritten Sources of Law
Introduction In the study of law, particularly within the context of the English legal system, understanding the sources of law is fundamental. Sources of ...

Discuss the Bolam Test in Reference to Two Cases: Mwanza & Another v Attorney General (Appeal 153 of 2016) [2019] ZMSC 33 and Kopa v University Teaching Hospital (SCZ No. 8 of 2007)
Introduction The Bolam test, originating from the landmark UK case of Bolam v Friern Hospital Management Committee [1957] 1 WLR 582, remains a cornerstone ...

Human Rights Law and International Humanitarian Law: Different Sides of the Same Coin?
Introduction The relationship between Human Rights Law (HRL) and International Humanitarian Law (IHL) has long been a subject of academic and legal debate. Both ...

The Circumstances Under Which an Ex Parte Judgment is Set Aside Under O.9 r12 and O.9 r27 of the Civil Procedure Rules: A Comparative Analysis with Reference to Nicholas Roussos v Ghulam Hussein Habib Viram
Introduction In the realm of civil litigation, the concept of an ex parte judgment arises when a court delivers a decision in the absence ...

Right to a Tribunal vs. Atos: Underscoring Challenges in the UK Welfare System
Introduction This essay examines the intersection of the right to a tribunal and the role of Atos, a private company contracted by the UK ...
