Scenario 1: Social Media and Political Comment – Judicial Conduct and Impartiality
Introduction The increasing prevalence of social media has introduced new challenges to the principles of judicial impartiality and independence, particularly when judges engage in ...
With Reference to the Module Materials and the Principles of Judicial Review in EU Law Established by the Court of Justice of the European Union, Advise TechSolutions GmbH, the EMPA, and Estonia on the Admissibility and Substance of Their Actions under Article 263 TFEU, and Assess the Possibility of Compensation for TechSolutions GmbH from the EU Commission
Introduction This essay seeks to provide legal advice to TechSolutions GmbH, the European Medicines Procurement Agency (EMPA), and Estonia concerning the admissibility and substance ...
It is claimed that the purpose of the Separation of Powers doctrine is to prevent arbitrary and authoritarian government by ensuring that, even where overlaps occur between the branches of the state, there are sufficient checks and balances in the system. Critically evaluate whether there are sufficient checks and balances in the UK constitution as between the executive and the legislature, to ensure an effective separation of powers.
Introduction The doctrine of the Separation of Powers, primarily articulated by Montesquieu in the 18th century, seeks to prevent the concentration of authority by ...
Nigeria’s “Compulsory Treatment and Care for Victims of Gunshots Act, 2017”: A List of Related Terms, Words, and Concepts with Definitions
Introduction This essay explores the key terms, words, and concepts associated with Nigeria’s Compulsory Treatment and Care for Victims of Gunshots Act, 2017. Enacted ...
Imasuku Mistakenly Believes That One of the Guests Is Stealing Vipya and Decides to Hit Him with a Big Spoon: What Type of Tort Is Being Committed?
Introduction This essay examines the legal implications of a scenario in which Imasuku, acting under a mistaken belief that a guest is stealing vipya, ...
The Mens Rea Requirements for Murder and Unlawful Act Manslaughter are Wholly Unsatisfactory and Make Both Offences Much Too Wide in Scope; In Contrast, the Emphasis on ‘Obvious and Serious Risk of Death’ Has Made Gross Negligence Manslaughter Too Narrow
Introduction This essay critically evaluates the mens rea requirements for murder and unlawful act manslaughter, arguing that their broad scope results in an unsatisfactory ...
Potential Claims Arising from a Road Traffic Incident: A Legal Analysis
Introduction This essay examines the legal implications of a road traffic incident involving multiple parties, with a focus on identifying potential claims under UK ...
Does Vicarious Liability Apply When an Employee Commits a Criminal Offence, Specifically Harassment?
Introduction This essay examines the application of vicarious liability in the context of an employee committing a criminal offence, with a specific focus on ...
The Court of Appeal’s Ruling on Defamation: Analysis of Key Principles in Tort Law
Introduction This essay examines a significant Court of Appeal ruling in the context of defamation law within the tort framework. The case addresses the ...
Binding Precedent in the English Legal System
Introduction The doctrine of binding precedent, often referred to as stare decisis (to stand by decisions), is a fundamental principle of the English legal ...
