Judgement of Carter v Boehm Doctrine Issues and Its Effect
Introduction The doctrine established in Carter v Boehm (1766) represents a cornerstone of insurance law, particularly in the context of the principle of utmost ...
A Personal Account of Learning About Law from Mabo v Queensland (No.2) [1992] HCA 23
Introduction The decision of the High Court of Australia in Mabo v Queensland (No.2) [1992] HCA 23 stands as a landmark judgment, fundamentally reshaping ...
How Different is the Legislative Process of the UK from Mauritius?
Introduction This essay explores the differences between the legislative processes of the United Kingdom (UK) and Mauritius, two nations with distinct political and constitutional ...
Constitutional Law Continuous Assessment: Wednesbury Unreasonableness and Immunity for Policy Decisions by Public Authorities
Introduction This essay examines the principle that an authority exercising policy discretion conferred by statute is liable for negligence only if its actions are ...
Amy’s Legal Position in Relation to Lina, Krish, and Ben: A Contract Law Analysis
Introduction This essay examines the legal position of Amy, who runs a small online business selling second-hand designer handbags, in relation to three potential ...
Problem Question: Breach of Duty of Care by The Bridgegate School and Dr. Sharma
Introduction This essay examines two distinct scenarios involving potential breaches of duty of care under English tort law, specifically focusing on negligence. The first ...
You Should Attend a Hearing at a Local Court and Watch the Court of Appeal Hearing in Kristie Higgs v Farmor’s School [2025] EWCA Civ 109
Introduction This essay examines the advocacy styles of lawyers observed during a local court hearing and in the Court of Appeal case of Kristie ...
Criminal Liabilities of Agyei and the Taxi Driver: A Critical Analysis
Introduction This essay examines the criminal liabilities of Agyei and the taxi driver in the context of a tragic series of events involving domestic ...
In Holland v Hodgson [1872] LR 7 CP 328, Blackburn J Stated That Articles Not Otherwise Attached to the Land Than by Their Own Weight Are Not to Be Considered as Part of the Land Unless the Circumstances Are Such as to Show That They Were Intended to Be Part of the Land . . . and That on the Contrary, an Article Which Is Affixed to the Land Even Slightly Is to Be Considered as Part of the Land, Unless the Circumstances Are Such as to Show That It Was Intended All Along to Continue a Chattel. Discuss What Is Meant by That Extract from the Case
Introduction This essay explores the legal principle articulated by Blackburn J in the seminal case of Holland v Hodgson [1872] LR 7 CP 328, ...
Generally, agents who act outside their authority cannot bind their principals in contracts with third parties. To what extent has the law of agency clarified this area with respect to ostensible/apparent authority?
Introduction The law of agency governs the relationship between a principal and an agent, whereby the agent acts on behalf of the principal to ...
