The Purposive Approach to Statutory Interpretation Gives Judges Excessive Power, Allowing Them to Impose Their Own Views Rather Than Upholding the Intention of Parliament
Introduction Statutory interpretation is a cornerstone of the judicial process, ensuring that laws enacted by Parliament are applied effectively in real-world contexts. Among the ...
The Doctrine of Precedent as the Cornerstone of the Common Law System: Complexities and Controversies in the Irish Legal System
Introduction The doctrine of precedent, often referred to as *stare decisis*, is a fundamental principle of the common law system, providing consistency and predictability ...
The Doctrine of Precedent is Understood as Being the Cornerstone of the Common Law System, but its Application in Practice is Not Without its Complexities and Controversies
Introduction The doctrine of precedent, often referred to as stare decisis, stands as a fundamental principle of the common law system, particularly within the ...
Doctrine of Precedence: Complexities and Controversies in the Irish Common Law System
Introduction The doctrine of precedent, or stare decisis, is a cornerstone of the common law system, ensuring consistency and predictability in judicial decisions. Within ...
Elements of a Contract of Sale of Goods and Supply of Services
Introduction The law governing contracts for the sale of goods and the supply of services forms a cornerstone of commercial transactions in the United ...
Judgement of Carter v Boehm Doctrine Issues and Its Effect
Introduction The doctrine established in Carter v Boehm (1766) represents a cornerstone of insurance law, particularly in the context of the principle of utmost ...
A Personal Account of Learning About Law from Mabo v Queensland (No.2) [1992] HCA 23
Introduction The decision of the High Court of Australia in Mabo v Queensland (No.2) [1992] HCA 23 stands as a landmark judgment, fundamentally reshaping ...
How Different is the Legislative Process of the UK from Mauritius?
Introduction This essay explores the differences between the legislative processes of the United Kingdom (UK) and Mauritius, two nations with distinct political and constitutional ...
Constitutional Law Continuous Assessment: Wednesbury Unreasonableness and Immunity for Policy Decisions by Public Authorities
Introduction This essay examines the principle that an authority exercising policy discretion conferred by statute is liable for negligence only if its actions are ...
Amy’s Legal Position in Relation to Lina, Krish, and Ben: A Contract Law Analysis
Introduction This essay examines the legal position of Amy, who runs a small online business selling second-hand designer handbags, in relation to three potential ...
