Doctrine of Joint Enterprise in Criminal Law
Introduction The doctrine of joint enterprise in criminal law has long been a central, yet contentious, principle in the UK legal system, particularly in ...
There Are Four Ways in Which a Person Can Become a Member or Shareholder of a Company with Share Capital, and Six Ways a Member Can Cease Being a Member of a Company: A Comprehensive Analysis
Introduction This essay explores the fundamental aspects of company law in the UK, focusing on membership in companies with share capital. Specifically, it examines ...
In Re: Dispute over Supply Contract – Analysis of Ms Patel’s Case
Introduction This essay provides an analysis of a contractual dispute between Precision Components Ltd., represented by Ms Diya Patel, and their supplier, Northbridge Materials ...
Common Law: A Brief Overview
This essay provides a short and concise exploration of common law, a fundamental pillar of the legal system in many jurisdictions, particularly in the ...
‘A court invokes whichever of the rules [literal; mischief; golden] produces a result that satisfies its sense of justice in the case before it. Although the literal rule is the one most frequently referred to in express terms, the courts treat all three as valid and refer to them as occasion demands …’ To what extent does this statement accurately describe the current approach to statutory interpretation in England and Wales as explained in recent decisions of the UK Supreme Court?
Introduction This essay examines the extent to which John Willis’s statement from 1938, suggesting courts selectively apply the literal, golden, and mischief rules of ...
An Assessment of Zambia’s Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Policy in Promoting Sustainable Development in the Mining Sector
Introduction As a fourth-year Zambian law student, the intersection of environmental law and sustainable development in Zambia’s mining sector represents a critical area of ...
A Court Invokes Whichever of the Rules [Literal; Mischief; Golden] Produces a Result that Satisfies Its Sense of Justice in the Case Before It. Although the Literal Rule Is the One Most Frequently Referred to in Express Terms, the Courts Treat All Three as Valid and Refer to Them as Occasion Demands. To What Extent Does This Statement Accurately Describe the Current Approach to Statutory Interpretation in England and Wales as Explained in Recent Decisions of the UK Supreme Court?
Introduction This essay explores the extent to which the statement provided reflects the current approach to statutory interpretation in England and Wales, particularly in ...
Advise Sam’s Widow and Lola as to Whether They May Have a Viable Claim in Tort Against the Police for Their Handling of the Sinkhole Incident
Introduction This essay examines the potential tortious liability of the police in relation to their handling of a sinkhole incident on 4 January 2024, ...
Decision of the High Court of Australia in Mabo v Queensland (No.2) [1992] HCA 23: Reflections on Its Impact and Personal Insights
Introduction The decision of the High Court of Australia in *Mabo v Queensland (No.2)* [1992] HCA 23 stands as a seminal moment in Australian ...
Review and Discussion of Academic Commentaries on R v Nedrick
Introduction This essay reviews and critically discusses three academic commentaries published in legal journals regarding the case of R v Nedrick [1986] 1 WLR ...
